text
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
I was about to do a magnificent piece. One that would sum my long time involvement with the white monochrome; it would be a conclusion of this intimate research, featuring the white pieces that are my personal favourites, amongst which there would be a monochrome from 19th century even. I would be remaking, copying, faking some iconic works that have touched upon the theme of this final anaemic cul de sac of modernism or a carte blanche for a new thought, and at the same time I would be questioning the issues of original versus copy. I was of the opinion that the world would benefit of general relaxation when it comes to the question of The Original - since to show an original requires a lot of money, word and time exchange (with gallerists, rights’ holders, insurance companies …), many of the exciting art achievements miss out on being shown and seen in certain places, so to show replicas instead should be just as well (if that did not cost also, that is). I was also of the opinion that it is often in the late 20th and 21st century art, the thought or concept that makes the piece, rather than the aura of the original. And finally, I was of the opinion that to see the brilliant thought through a copy is much better than not seeing it at all. And showing it, for that matter. I thought. Then I started trying to paint one of Ryman’s Untitled 65. In acryl even, oh, the silliness of youth. |
||||
Five failed attempts to paint a replica of one of Robert Ryman's Untitled 65 and one of my old paintings pretending to be Cyprien Gaillard's. 5 x acrylics on unframed canvas, cca 30x30cm; acryl and oil on canvas, 25x30cm; text. 2011 |
||||